Conducting an Effective Confidential Search in the Post-COVID Economy


As 2022 wrapped up, we noticed a growing trend. More clients have been reaching out to us about conducting confidential searches. What may be fueling this rise?

 

The current spike in confidential searches that we are experiencing are focused on operations or manufacturing leadership. We have some ideas about why that is, as well as tips for how to navigate such a search, which has distinct differences from an open search. It does not have to be as daunting as many fear it will be.

 

Confidential Searches – Why Now?

The pandemic that slammed into our country and economy (and not just ours) in early 2020 created circumstances in just about all aspects of society that shifted how people live, how we think about education, healthcare, travel, and employment, and, not insignificantly, how companies do business.

 

Think about it. Companies strained by lockdowns and supply chain slowdowns had to rely on their often pared-down workforce more than ever, and those in leadership positions had to come up with innovative ways to pivot or ramp up production despite skeletal crews. Employees everywhere sacrificed for their companies in a time of need. People are drained. The leaders in charge of keeping up with customer demands in this climate are especially exhausted, and their job burnout is spiking.

 

In an article about pandemic burnout, Forbes Magazine refers to a Gallup poll that noted that employee engagement rose steeply during the pandemic as people sensed an urgent increase in the vital purpose of their work, and yet employee well-being declined. Normally, those two metrics go hand in hand—engagement is up at the same time that well-being is. The pandemic broke the metrics mold.

 

Leaders in the operations and manufacturing realm are pulling back from the brink, trying to do their jobs without overextending to their health’s detriment. What looks like “quiet quitting” may be more like “let’s get back to some semblance of normal.” But organizations who have become accustomed to the overachieving Operations Leaders and their ability to do more with less, see what they think is a performance slip, so they start a confidential search to find someone who can help them achieve the new normal.


Another reason for an increase in confidential searches may well relate to the fact that in the depths of the pandemic, many companies found themselves doing emergency searches for upper-level operations leaders to help them navigate the diverse challenges of the COVID-slammed economy. They did not have the time to do the kind of deep dive they normally would, so they hired fast and furiously, only to find that now they have someone who is not really suited for the position. Time for a confidential search.


If either of these scenarios sounds familiar, or if you find you are wanting to do a confidential search for another reason, being aware of best practices can help you through any possible mine field.

 

The Drawbacks of Conducting a Confidential Search

The drawbacks of a confidential search are its impact on the timeliness or quality of the search. For one thing, fewer qualified candidates step forward when the name of the company is undisclosed.

 

A Job Is What You Do, an Organization Is Why You Do It

The best candidates are selective, and they want to thoroughly research an organization to ensure they are investing their time wisely. Candidates are typically drawn to an organization before they are drawn to a specific job. When they are unable to disclose the company, hiring managers find that some great candidates are reluctant to advance their candidacy.

 

Another drawback surfaces when the incumbent has performance issues and the organization plans to terminate them once a successor is identified. Prospective candidates could easily interpret this as a sign that the hiring organization has an inability to manage and/or communicate with their employees, thus questioning why they would ever put themselves in that position.

 

Modifications of the Search Process

Despite the drawbacks, there are some modifications that can be incorporated to help offset the negative impacts of a confidential search.

 

Understanding the Role

The front end of the recruitment is the same as in a standard search. It involves gaining an understanding of the need for the role, figuring out how to define success, and the creation of any candidate assessment or evaluation templates. 180one tailors these tools for each search, confidential or otherwise.


Sourcing

The methods an organization uses to identify candidates, is the phase of a search, that are most affected when the search is confidential. One strategy involves modifying the sequence of your discussions with prospective candidates.

  • If the organization’s need for a confidential search will expire on a certain date, 180one has found it effective to continue reaching out to candidates in a timely manner, but then to schedule follow-up calls with prospective candidates for when we can disclose. This approach uses the silent period to at least gauge interest, while not wasting time with detailed conversations until more meaningful information can be shared.
  • If the organization’s reason for a confidential search is based on a low performing incumbent, some work-arounds include using an NDA with prospective candidates, or only disclosing information to a small group of qualified and interested candidates you believe you can trust.
  • Doing outreach to candidates outside the company’s geographical area can help minimize the chance that the internal team or incumbent will find out through their channels that there is a search being conducted.


Job Descriptions

This one is a bit more obvious, but if an organization will distribute a job description via their network or interested parties, the position description must be scrubbed from any identifiers that could disclose the hiring organization. Pro-tip: Do not use past position descriptions as they tend to have a similar format or rely on common vernacular or acronyms that could ultimately leave your organization’s fingerprint. These candidates are smart, and it doesn’t take much to put the pieces together!


Research/Targeting

It is nearly impossible for an internal recruiter to conduct a confidential search without immediately giving away the company’s identity, thus it is important to use a third party recruiting firm. A recruiting firm’s arms-length relationship with the hiring organization tends to create enough of a buffer to protect the anonymity of the client. The recruiters simply need to eliminate certain talking points that would reveal too much information about the hiring organization.

 

Conducting an Effective and Efficient Confidential Search

Your goal in running a confidential search is to protect your organization’s anonymity while identifying the right candidates and maintaining your ongoing initiatives. In a timely manner, of course.

 

Even though candidate pools are typically smaller in a confidential search, especially in a tight labor market, finding a great candidate is possible. Establishing a solid search from the beginning, with a thoughtful strategy that mitigates pitfalls, will help your company succeed.

 

There is no reason that a confidential search needs to be any less effective than a traditional search. Leveraging the expertise of those who are experienced in conducting confidential searches could be the most valuable first step of the process.

 

By Greg Togni November 4, 2025
In today’s hyper-competitive business environment, retaining top talent has become one of the most pressing challenges for organizations of all sizes. According to recent data, 76% of private company executives consider talent retention a key to remaining competitive , and for good reason. The cost of replacing an employee can reach up to two times their annual salary, not to mention the loss of institutional knowledge, customer relationships, and team morale that often follows. Yet despite leaders recognizing its importance, 51% of employees are actively looking for or open to a new opportunity . This means that roughly half of your workforce could walk out the door at any time if they find a better offer, stronger culture, or more growth potential. In such a landscape, retention isn’t just an HR function; it’s a strategic imperative. Below, we explore the key drivers of employee retention and how companies can build a culture that keeps their best people engaged, loyal, and thriving. 1. Build a Culture of Recognition and Trust People don’t just work for paychecks—they work for appreciation. Studies show that 71% of employees would be less likely to leave if they were recognized more frequently . Recognition goes far beyond annual awards or performance reviews; it’s about cultivating a daily culture of appreciation. When employees feel that their contributions are valued, they’re more motivated, more loyal, and more invested in the company’s success. But recognition must be genuine and consistent. It can take many forms: a manager’s public praise in a meeting, a peer-to-peer “thank you” program, or even a personalized message from leadership. Recognition reinforces belonging, and belonging drives engagement. However, appreciation alone isn’t enough if leaders fail to act on employee feedback. When organizations solicit feedback but do nothing with it, it creates frustration and mistrust. Employees start to believe leadership doesn’t listen, which erodes morale. Transparency about what’s being done with feedback, whether changes are implemented or not, is essential to maintaining trust and retention. 2. Strengthen Leadership and Management Quality It’s often said that people don’t quit jobs, they quit managers. The data support this: seven out of ten workers who quit their jobs do so because of a bad manager . Poor management can take many forms, micromanagement, lack of communication, inconsistent expectations, or insufficient support. Whatever the cause, bad management destroys engagement faster than almost any other factor. To retain your best talent, invest in developing your leaders. Provide training on emotional intelligence, communication, and conflict resolution. Encourage managers to hold regular one-on-ones that focus on coaching rather than just task management. Good leaders inspire people to stay and grow; bad ones drive them away. Organizations that prioritize leadership development send a clear message: we care about your experience here, not just your output. 3. Make Onboarding an Experience, not a Process The employee experience starts on day one. A strong onboarding program sets the tone for engagement, connection, and retention. Research shows that 69% of employees are more likely to stay for at least three years after a great onboarding experience . That’s a powerful return on investment for something many companies still treat as a checklist exercise. Effective onboarding goes beyond paperwork and orientation. It integrates new hires into the company culture, connects them with mentors, and helps them understand how their role contributes to the organization’s mission. The first 90 days are critical; employees decide whether they see a long-term future with the company based largely on this period. Investing in structured, meaningful onboarding experiences pays dividends in loyalty, productivity, and morale. 4. Offer Continuous Learning and Career Growth In an era of rapid technological change, professional development is not just a perk; it’s a necessity. 94% of employees say they would stay longer if they had more learning opportunities. That statistic should grab every executive’s attention. Employees want to grow, evolve, and feel like they are moving forward in their careers. Creating a culture of continuous learning means offering access to courses, mentorship programs, cross-departmental projects, and leadership pathways. It also means making learning accessible through digital platforms, lunch-and-learns, or sponsorships for certifications. Career stagnation is one of the biggest drivers of turnover. When employees see no path upward, they start looking outward. Companies that invest in developing their people not only improve retention but also future-proof their workforce for tomorrow’s challenges. 5. Align Compensation with Value While culture, recognition, and growth matter deeply, compensation remains a critical factor. Fifty-six percent of employees say compensation is a top reason they would consider leaving . Fair pay isn’t just about keeping up with competitors; it’s about showing employees they are valued. This doesn’t always mean being the highest-paying employer in your market, but it does mean being competitive and transparent. Regular salary benchmarking, performance-based bonuses, and clear communication about pay structures build trust and loyalty. Additionally, benefits play a huge role. Health insurance, retirement contributions, flexible work arrangements, and mental health resources are all part of the total compensation package employees evaluate when deciding whether to stay. 6. Foster a Sense of Purpose and Belonging Employees today are looking for more than just a job; they’re looking for meaning. They want to know if their work has purpose and that their company stands for something beyond profit. This is especially true for younger generations entering the workforce. Creating purpose means connecting daily tasks to the broader mission and impact of the organization. When employees understand how their work contributes to something bigger, whether it’s serving customers, improving communities, or driving innovation, they’re more likely to stay committed and engaged. Belonging also plays a major role. Inclusive cultures where diverse voices are valued foster higher engagement and retention. Employees should feel they can bring their authentic selves to work without fear of judgment or exclusion. 7. Use Data to Drive Retention Strategy Retention isn’t a guessing game; it’s measurable. Use employee engagement surveys, turnover data, and stay interviews to understand why people stay and why they leave. Look for patterns by department, manager, or tenure. Once you identify the drivers of turnover, act quickly. Whether it’s improving communication, adjusting workloads, or rethinking career paths, data-driven decisions allow you to focus resources where they’ll have the greatest impact. Remember: what gets measured gets improved. Retaining top talent isn’t just an HR initiative - it’s a company-wide commitment. From executives to front-line managers, every leader has a role to play in creating an environment where people feel valued, supported, and inspired to stay. In the end, companies that treat employees as their most valuable asset - and act accordingly- will not only retain their best talent but also attract more of it. In a world where skilled workers have more choices than ever, the organizations that win will be those that make people want to stay.
By Effie Zimmerman October 22, 2025
 Chief Financial Officer ABOUT THE COMPANY CRU Data Security Group (CDSG) is a leading innovator and manufacturer of industrial-grade flash storage, secure storage products, and removable secure data solutions. With its OEM partners, CDSG supports security-conscious customers worldwide, including government agencies, military organizations, and corporations of all sizes. The company’s portfolio includes highly secure solid-state drives (SSDs), removable SSDs, disaster-proof storage devices, and forensic investigation tools. These purpose-built solutions are engineered to deliver the highest levels of security, durability, and performance, ensuring mission-critical data is protected whether operating at the edge, in the field, or behind the firewall. In 2025, Seattle-based private equity firm Pike Street Capital made a strategic investment in CDSG to accelerate growth through product innovation and targeted acquisitions. THE ROLE CDSG is seeking an experienced and results-driven Chief Financial Officer (CFO) to lead the financial strategy and execution of their high-growth business. The CFO will play a critical role in enabling both organic and acquisitive growth, optimizing operations, and driving value creation in partnership with the CEO and private equity sponsor. This is a hands-on executive leadership role ideal for a proven financial leader with a track record of operating in dynamic, performance-driven environments. RESPONSIBILITIES Executive & Strategic Leadership Serve as a strategic partner to the CEO and executive team, actively contributing to policy, direction, and long-term planning. Help define and execute the company’s growth strategy in alignment with operational, financial, and market objectives. Drive a high-performance culture through accountability, transparency, and collaboration. Lead by example, setting the tone and culture across the organization. Operate as a player/coach, comfortable building models, developing presentations, and engaging directly in critical business issues. Attract, develop, and retain top-tier financial and operational talent. Lead major business initiatives and projects (e.g., productivity improvement, pricing strategies) with measurable results. Shoulder broad business leadership responsibility, beyond traditional finance functions. Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A) Own the development and ongoing refinement of annual budgets, monthly forecasts, and long-term financial planning. Track and maintain key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure performance against strategic goals. Conduct hands-on analysis of financial performance, with actionable insights to achieve growth and EBITDA targets. Lead investment analysis and decision support, including customer pricing models and full business case development. Demonstrated expertise in labor cost management and margin improvement strategies. Bring experience across multiple ERP platforms; ERP selection and implementation experience is highly preferred. Accounting & Financial Operations Oversee all accounting and finance functions, ensuring accuracy, integrity, and timeliness of financial information. Prepare and deliver comprehensive financial reporting packages, including monthly P&L, balance sheet, cash flow, and covenant compliance. Ensure all financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and meet internal and external stakeholder requirements. Lead all month-end close activities, including general ledger, balance sheet reconciliations, and overhead allocation. Enhance and scale accounting processes, systems, and internal controls to support company growth. Coordinate the annual audit process, ensuring unqualified audit results. Lead the preparation and management of company-wide budgets, including revenue and capital expenditure planning. Treasury & Working Capital Management Lead cash flow forecasting, management, and decision-making around weekly cash disbursements. Improve the full cash cycle, credit policy, collections, inventory, and payables management. Manage lender relationships and covenant compliance. Use forward-looking cash flow analysis to guide capital structure decisions and working capital strategy. M&A & Private Equity Engagement Collaborate with the leadership team, private equity sponsors on M&A activities. Experience or understanding of value creation planning, reporting, and board-level communication. EDUCATION, EXPERIENCE & SKILLS REQUIRED Bachelor’s degree in finance, accounting, business administration, or a related discipline; CPA and MBA strongly preferred. Extensive experience in senior financial leadership roles, ideally within a private equity-backed or high-growth environment. Deep understanding of financial and operational disciplines, including P&L ownership, balance sheet management, cash flow optimization, and capital allocation. Demonstrated experience in corporate governance, risk management, and regulatory compliance. Proven ability to lead complex negotiations related to financing, vendor agreements, M&A, and commercial terms. Expertise in budgeting, forecasting, financial modeling, and working capital management; prior public accounting experience is a plus. Strong business acumen with the ability to quickly assess new challenges and make sound, data-driven decisions in a dynamic environment. Natural leadership presence with the ability to build trust and credibility across all levels of an organization and with external stakeholders. Resilient under pressure with a disciplined approach to prioritization, execution, and delegation. Exceptional communication skills—both written and verbal—with the ability to clearly articulate financial concepts to non-financial stakeholders. Committed to service excellence, with strong interpersonal skills and a collaborative leadership style. High attention to detail and precision, balanced with the ability to think strategically and see the broader business context. Interested in Learning More? 180one has been retained by CDSG to manage this search. If interested in learning more about the opportunity, please contact Nicole Brady at 180one at: 503.699.0184 / nicole@180one.com .
By Greg Togni October 3, 2025
In today’s business climate, reorganizations have become the norm rather than the exception. Companies shift structure to respond to market changes, streamline costs, adopt new technologies, or realign with strategy. But while the headlines focus on job cuts or new leadership, one critical factor often overlooked in the success or failure of a reorganization is managerial span of control : the number of direct reports assigned to each manager. When companies get this wrong, they risk derailing even the best-planned structural change. When they get it right, the results include faster decision-making, improved employee engagement, and better execution of strategic goals. So how do the most successful companies handle this delicate balance during a reorg? The Pitfalls of Overloading Managers The pressure to do more with less can tempt organizations to increase the number of employees reporting directly to each manager. After all, fewer managers mean lower salary overhead, less bureaucracy, and theoretically, a leaner, faster organization. But research consistently shows that increasing a manager’s span of control beyond a certain point leads to declining effectiveness , both for the manager and their team. According to a comprehensive study by Bain & Company, companies with top-quartile performance in productivity and employee engagement tend to cap manager spans at no more than 7 to 10 direct reports , depending on the complexity of the work and the level of autonomy of the team. Beyond this range, several problems begin to surface: Decreased coaching and development time: With too many direct reports, managers struggle to provide regular feedback or support individual growth. Slower decision-making: Managers become bottlenecks as more team members wait for approvals or guidance. Increased burnout: Overloaded managers report higher levels of stress, disengagement, and turnover. Reduced innovation: Less time for strategic thinking means less opportunity to solve problems creatively or improve team performance. Harvard Business Review echoes this concern, noting that “as spans widen, the average quality of management and leadership drops,” especially in knowledge-driven or high-complexity work environments. Span of Control: One Size Doesn’t Fit All So what’s the right number? The answer depends on context , and smart companies know that not all roles, teams, or business units require the same structure. Key variables include: Task complexity: Teams doing routine, repeatable work (like call centers or transactional processing) can operate effectively with spans as wide as 15-20 direct reports. In contrast, research and development teams often require narrower spans due to higher collaboration and oversight needs. Employee experience: Highly experienced, autonomous employees require less hands-on supervision, allowing for broader spans. Manager capability: Not all managers are equally equipped to handle large teams. Leadership training, experience, and support systems (like team leads or AI tools) can influence optimal span. Organizational culture: Companies with strong cultures of self-management and clear accountability structures may tolerate wider spans without performance drops. A 2023 McKinsey report emphasizes this variability, stating, “Leading companies tailor spans of control by role and level, not by arbitrary benchmarks.” Case in Point: Reorg Success Stories Let’s look at a few organizations that have successfully navigated reorgs by paying close attention to managerial spans: 1. Microsoft During Satya Nadella’s early tenure as CEO, Microsoft underwent a major organizational overhaul to break down silos and improve collaboration. A key part of the strategy was flattening the org , but not indiscriminately. Nadella emphasized “clarity of purpose” and invested heavily in leadership development to ensure managers were ready to handle broader spans only where appropriate. The result? Productivity rose, engagement improved, and innovation accelerated across product teams. 2. Procter & Gamble (P&G) P&G restructured in the early 2010s to reduce costs and improve agility. Rather than simply cutting layers, the company also reassessed manager-to-employee ratios by function. In areas like finance, where standard processes prevail, spans increased. In innovation and marketing roles, they were kept tight to preserve creativity and oversight. The tailored approach helped P&G maintain performance through a major shift. 3. Spotify Famous for its “squad” model, Spotify empowers small autonomous teams with clear leadership support. Managers, often called Chapter Leads, have limited spans to ensure close mentorship and skill development within specific technical domains. This model has supported Spotify’s growth while preserving agility and innovation. Practical Guidance for Leaders Planning a Reorg If your company is considering, or currently navigating, a reorganization, here are five evidence-based principles to keep in mind: 1. Start with the work, not the structure Begin by analyzing the actual tasks teams are responsible for. How complex is the work? How interdependent are the roles? What level of oversight is needed? Design the structure around the needs of the work, not arbitrary span targets. 2. Avoid flattening without a function Flattening layers can reduce costs, but it can also create chaos if not executed thoughtfully. Ensure that wider spans are matched with the right capabilities, tools, and cultural support. 3. Invest in manager readiness If you do decide to widen spans, ensure your managers are trained in time management, delegation, coaching, and the use of technology. Even experienced managers can falter without support. 4. Use data to monitor and adjust Keep track of KPIs like employee engagement, turnover, decision speed, and manager satisfaction post-reorg. These can provide early warning signs if spans are too wide or teams are struggling. 5. Communicate clearly and consistently Structural changes can breed uncertainty. Communicate not just what is changing, but why, and how it will improve the experience for both managers and their teams. Structure Should Enable Strategy A reorganization is not just a reshuffling of boxes on an org chart, it’s an opportunity to realign your workforce with your business goals. But even the most visionary strategy will falter if leaders are overwhelmed, disengaged, or unsupported. As the research shows, successful reorgs pay close attention to the human factor. Avoiding overly wide spans of control is not about bureaucracy; it’s about enabling leaders to lead .
More Posts