How Google’s Rule of Four Can Streamline Executive Searches

How Google’s Rule of Four Can Streamline and Improve Executive Searches

You’re adding an executive to your leadership team.

You’ve done your homework and identified some hopeful candidates.

Now it’s time to identify a candidate who is a good fit for the role and culture, so it's important that all hopefuls meet with as many people in your organization as possible.

Right?

Well…not necessarily.

Considering the historically tight labor market, finding an edge over your competition today means being more thoughtful about the design of your recruiting process. If you want to streamline your interview and selection process while increasing your odds of a successful outcome, keep reading.

What follows are interview tips and best practices to help you identify the right candidates, determine the optimal number of interviewers, and ensure a candidate experience that pays off with a timely hire.

The Law of Diminishing Returns: Why Less is More

Most people are familiar with the law of diminishing returns. It’s an economic principle stating that there is a point at which adding additional units of input (such as labor or capital) will no longer result in a proportional increase in output.

The law of diminishing returns reminds us that there is value in moderation and that more doesn't always mean better.

If you're struggling to fill roles with ideal candidates, applying this concept to your current interviewing practices will help spur results. Having too many people from your organization involved in the interview process can lead to indecision based on varying opinions of the interview team and candidates withdrawing due to the extended process.

Improve Search Outcomes with the Google Rule of Four

At some point, Google noticed that when it comes to getting the best talent on board, it’s incredibly important to move quickly and efficiently. That's why Google decided to implement the "Rule of Four" for most of its interviews.

The rule simply states that a maximum of four people should be involved in the interview process. This rule was based on Google analyzing their historical hiring data showing that the success rate of a hire when having four people on the interview team was almost identical to those with more people in 95% of cases.

The Rule of Four is a simple but effective way to streamline the interview process and make better hiring decisions faster.

If we follow the lead of the interview process at Google, having an efficient interview structure not only maintains the success rate of hires, but can also provide a more positive candidate experience resulting in an improved acceptance rate.

When it comes to executive-level positions, this philosophy takes on even greater importance. The executive hiring and recruiting process is notoriously lengthy and complicated, often taking months or even years to complete — a result of having too many cooks in the kitchen.

However, research has shown that adding more people to the interview team lengthens the entire process and does not necessarily result in better hires. A shorter interview process, with a small team, is often more effective in identifying top candidates.

Additional Drawbacks of a Lengthy Hiring Process

Loss of time. The more people you have involved in the hiring process, the more you’ll compete with too many calendars, and it becomes difficult to schedule interviews. This will greatly increase the time it takes to fill a position.

Reduced productivity. For each current employee spending time interviewing, productivity of their regular job duties goes down.

Candidate exhaustion. With a slow hiring process, candidates assume they are not wanted and that their background is not valued. They are most likely to lose interest and look elsewhere.

Other opportunities. Google's head of HR has said that "the best people don't wait." A quicker hiring process means you’re not losing your best candidates to other opportunities.

Executive Hiring Best Practices: Streamline and Simplify

Instead of spending time on countless interviews conducted by too many people, consider these steps to streamline your interview process. With fewer people involved and a solid plan, you’ll eliminate bias, get more accurate feedback post-interview, and decide that everyone on your team can agree with.

Structuring Executive Interviews for an Optimal Outcome

Step 1: Build a Small but Mighty Team

The first step to streamlining your executive interview process is to build a small but mighty interview team. When it comes to interviewing executives, less is more. And no more than four is ideal. You want to make sure that you have a team of people who are qualified to ask tough questions and evaluate candidates objectively. Typically, the interview team is comprised of the hiring manager, a peer to the role, subject matter experts, and human resources. Having too many people involved in the process can often lead to bias and slow down decision-making.

Step 2: Employ Structured Interviews

The second step to streamlining your interview process is to employ structured interviews. This means that interview questions are developed specifically to assess candidates on the skills needed to be successful in the role. In addition, each candidate should be asked the same set of questions in the same order. This will help you to compare candidates more effectively and eliminate bias.

Step 3: Use a Candidate Scorecard

The third step to streamlining your interview process is to clarify the feedback process. You want to make sure that everyone on your team knows how to give feedback and that there is a system in place for collecting it. Utilizing a Candidate Scorecard is an effective and organized tool used for these purposes. Interviewers provide numerical ratings for each candidate over a variety of predetermined skills or traits needed in the role based on the candidate’s interview responses on the Candidate Scorecard. This will help to ensure that everyone is on the same page and that you are making decisions based on accurate information.

Step 4: Make a Decision

The fourth and final step to streamlining your interview process is to decide. Once you have collected all the information, it’s time to decide. This can be tricky but trusting the process will pay off in spades.

Apply Google’s Rule of Four to Your Next Candidate Search

A streamlined interviewing process will help you avoid any possibility of diminishing returns during your search for your next executive hire.

180one is Portland’s trusted partner for executive recruitment. We go beyond traditional headhunters simplifying how you hire leaders with a complete range of services — including developing candidate success profiles and scorecards and designing structured interviews and candidate success profiles. We have the tools and resources to help you find the perfect candidate for your next role. We'd be happy to chat. Book a call HERE.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

New Opportunity: Corporate Controller

By Effie Zimmerman • February 6, 2026

Corporate Controller ABOUT THE COMPANY In 2024, Northwest Pump celebrated its 65th year of service. Since our founding, we’ve grown from humble beginnings into a trusted name in the petroleum and industrial industry. Through the decades, our commitment to quality, integrity and our valued customers has remained the foundation of everything we do. Northwest Pump provides a wide range of distribution and service capabilities to fueling and industrial customers across the Western United States. The Company’s 350 employees serve nearly 6,000 customers across its growing 20 branch locations. Northwest Pump’s people-first culture is highly regarded for providing a broad product portfolio, consultative services, and leading fill rates. In late 2024, NW Pump joined forces with H.I.G. Capital to bring you even better support and customer service. H.I.G. is a global alternative investment firm with $66 billion of capital under management. This acquisition not only validates the company’s strength but also reflects its continued potential for growth under new ownership. ABOUT THE POSITION Reporting directly to the CFO, the Corporate Controller will lead the accounting function, playing a critical role in ensuring financial accuracy, operational discipline, and scalable processes to support growth and value creation. This role partners closely with executive leadership and ownership, delivering timely, GAAP-compliant financial reporting while strengthening internal controls and upgrading systems and processes. The Controller will oversee all accounting operations, including monthly close, financial reporting, inventory accounting, and compliance, while building a high-performing team capable of supporting a complex, multi-location distribution environment. This position is highly hands-on and well-suited for a leader who thrives in a fast-paced, results-driven setting and is comfortable driving change. DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES Own the monthly, quarterly, and annual close processes, ensuring accurate and timely financial statements in accordance with US GAAP. Lead all core accounting functions, including general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, fixed assets, inventory, and revenue recognition. Support mergers and acquisitions by participating in financial due diligence and assisting with the post-close integration of accounting policies, controls, reporting processes, and financial systems. Oversee inventory accounting across a multi-branch distribution footprint, including costing, reserves, and cycle count processes. Design, implement, and maintain strong internal controls and accounting policies appropriate for a PE-backed environment. Serve as the primary point of contact for external auditors, tax advisors, and other third-party providers. Partner with FP&A, operations, and leadership to provide financial insights that support margin improvement, working capital optimization, and growth initiatives. Support ERP optimization, systems integrations, and process improvements as the business scales organically and through acquisitions. Prepare reporting and analysis for executive leadership and ownership, including ad hoc requests. Recruit, develop, and mentor an accounting team, establishing clear accountability and a culture of continuous improvement. QUALIFICATIONS Bachelor’s degree in Accounting, Finance, or related field; CPA preferred. 10+ years of progressive accounting experience, including prior controller or assistant controller experience. Public accounting experience is preferred. CPA required. Strong knowledge of US GAAP and financial reporting. Experience in manufacturing or industrial services business preferred. Demonstrated experience in modernizing accounting processes and systems. Hands-on leadership style with the ability to balance detail orientation and big-picture thinking. ERP system experience and a track record of process improvement. Strong communication skills with the ability to partner effectively across finance and operations. Interested in Learning More? 180one has been retained by Northwest Pump to manage this search. If interested in learning more about the opportunity, please contact Nicole Brady at 503-699-0184 or via email at nicole@180one.com .

New Opportunity: Chief Executive Officer

By Effie Zimmerman • January 29, 2026

Chief Executive Officer ABOUT THE COMPANY EC Electric is an innovative electrical contracting firm dedicated to powering lives across various sectors, including mission-critical AI data centers, semiconductor chip manufacturers, industrial, federal work, commercial, and renewable energy projects. With a commitment to providing high-quality electrical solutions, the company specializes in cutting-edge technologies and sustainable practices. Known for its robust service offerings, including electrical construction, maintenance, and energy management, EC Electric stands out in the marketplace by focusing on safety, efficiency, and customer satisfaction. This $500 million-a-year company is part of the E-J Group of Companies across the nation, celebrating our 127th year of private ownership. Our mission is to create a brighter, more electrified future while upholding our values of integrity, safety, quality, equity, fulfillment, and profitability. ABOUT THE POSITION As the Chief Executive Officer , you will be the visionary leader of EC Electric, steering the company's strategic direction and operational efficiency to achieve sustainable growth and innovation in the electrical contracting industry. You will collaborate with the executive team, employees, and stakeholders to enhance our reputation as a leading provider of electrical services and solutions, ensuring we remain agile and responsive to market demands. DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES Strategic Leadership: Develop and articulate a clear vision and strategic plan that aligns with EC Electric's mission to drive profitability and market expansion. Initiate strategic partnerships and alliances that leverage EC Electric's capabilities in renewable energy and advanced electrical systems. Operational Excellence: Oversee operational processes, ensuring the execution of projects aligns with EC Electric's commitment to safety, quality, and timely delivery. Utilize data-driven insights to improve operational efficiencies and manage resources effectively across all business units. Innovation and Sustainability: Drive the adoption of innovative technologies and sustainable practices within the company to enhance service offerings and reduce environmental impact. Encourage a culture of innovation, empowering teams to explore new solutions that meet the changing needs of clients in a dynamic industry landscape. Stakeholder Engagement : Cultivate long-term relationships with clients, contractors, and community partners to enhance visibility and reputation in the industry. Represent EC Electric in industry associations and public events, positioning the company as a thought leader in electrical contracting and energy solutions. Financial Management: Ensure fiscal responsibility by overseeing budgeting processes, expense management, and financial forecasting to meet the company’s growth objectives. Identify opportunities for cost efficiencies and revenue generation through new service offerings and market penetration strategies. Workforce Development: Promote a positive and inclusive workplace culture that prioritizes employee engagement, safety, and professional development. Sustain and expand training/mentorship programs to develop future leaders within the organization and ensure a skilled workforce ready to tackle evolving industry challenges. Compliance and Governance: Ensure compliance with all industry regulations, safety standards, and environmental practices, maintaining EC Electric’s strong reputation for integrity and excellence. Implement risk management strategies to safeguard the company’s assets and sustain its operational integrity. QUALIFICATIONS Bachelor’s degree in business administration, engineering, or related field; MBA or relevant advanced degree preferred. 15+ years of experience in senior leadership roles within the electrical contracting or related construction industries. Proven ability to drive business growth and operational success in a competitive environment. Strong analytical and problem-solving abilities, with a focus on data-driven decision-making. Excellent communication and interpersonal skills, adept at fostering collaboration and motivating teams. Advantages of Working at EC Electric: Leading electrical contracting organization focused on innovation and sustainability. Commitment to employee development and career advancement opportunities. Comprehensive compensation and benefits packages, including health and wellness programs. Supportive corporate culture values community engagement and social responsibility. Opportunity to work on high-impact projects that shape the infrastructure of communities. Interested in Learning More? 180one has been retained by EC Electric to manage this search. If interested in learning more about the opportunity, please contact Nicole Brady at 503-699-0184 or via email at nicole@180one.com . EC Electric is an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer and ensures equal employment opportunity for all persons without discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, age, disability, marital status, citizenship, or any other characteristic protected by law. Physical Demands: The physical demands described here are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. While performing the duties of this job, the employee is regularly required to use their hands and talk or hear. The employee is frequently required to stand, walk, sit, reach with hands and arms; climb or balance, and stoop, kneel, crouch, or crawl. The employee must occasionally lift and/or move up to 50 pounds. Work environment: The work environment characteristics described here are representative of those an employee encounters while performing the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. This includes the ability to have close (clear vision 20 inches or less) and distant vision (clear vision 20 inches or more), Depth Perception (three-dimensional vision, ability to judge distances and spatial relationships); Ability to Adjust Focus (ability to adjust the eye to bring an object into sharp focus), and the ability to see color. The noise level in the work environment can be quiet, moderate, or loud.

The Cost of Hesitation: Why Delaying a Leadership Change Quietly Destroys Value

By Greg Togni • January 12, 2026

Few decisions carry more weight, or more emotional friction, than upgrading management. Whether in a private equity–backed business or a closely held private company, leaders know the decision matters. They also know it’s uncomfortable. Incumbent executives may have helped close the deal, built the business, or earned deep loyalty from employees and customers. In that context, waiting can feel prudent, even humane. Yet across ownership structures, cycles, and industries, the evidence points in one direction: delaying action on leadership misalignment quietly erodes value long before performance visibly breaks. What the Data Consistently Shows Research across management transitions paints a consistent picture. Roughly half of PE-backed companies replace the CEO within the first two years of ownership, with many changes occurring in the first year. Studies of executive transitions show failure rates between 30% and 40% in the first 18 months, most often driven not by incompetence but by misalignment- on mandate, pace, or priorities. The lesson is not that boards are impatient. It’s that leadership fit matters more than familiarity, and a misfit rarely corrects itself with time. The Most Expensive Period Is After Doubt Sets In By the time a board or ownership group agrees that a leadership upgrade may be needed, value erosion is often already underway. Growth initiatives slow. Decision-making becomes cautious. Reporting grows heavier as leaders explain results instead of driving them. High performers sense uncertainty and begin to disengage. In PE-backed environments, this dynamic plays out faster and with fewer buffers. But private companies experience the same slow bleed, just over a longer horizon. The “One More Quarter” Fallacy “Let’s give it one more quarter” is one of the most expensive sentences in governance. Boards and owners often justify delay by pointing to an initiative in flight, system implementation, or temporary market headwinds. But studies of executive performance show that trajectory matters more than absolute results. If clarity, momentum, and conviction are not improving, time rarely fixes the issue. A common pattern: leadership change is debated for several quarters. When a new executive finally steps in, they make decisive moves within 60 to 90 days, moves that had been discussed, analyzed, and deferred for a year. The opportunity cost of that delay is real, even if it never appears cleanly in the P&L. Missed Windows Are Permanent Losses The most dangerous cost of waiting is not short-term underperformance; it’s a missed opportunity. In PE-backed companies, similar windows appear around add-on acquisitions, operational transformations, or pricing resets. A capable but misaligned leader can miss those windows by moving too slowly or pulling the wrong levers. Once missed, those opportunities rarely reopen on the same terms. Loyalty Is Expensive, But So Is Delay Many delayed leadership changes stem from understandable loyalty: to founders, long-tenured executives, or leaders who were instrumental during diligence or early growth. But fiduciary responsibility ultimately outweighs emotional equity. The most effective boards separate gratitude for past contributions from clarity about future requirements. They also recognize that earlier action is usually kinder. Early transitions allow for controlled narratives, thoughtful role changes, and dignified exits. Late-stage changes tend to feel abrupt, personal, and destabilizing. A Simple Test for Owners and Boards One question cut through most debates: If we were hiring for this role today, knowing what we now know, would we make the same choice? If the answer isn’t an unambiguous yes, delay rarely improves the outcome. Another signal is how leadership discussions consume time. When meetings shift from strategy and growth to coaching, shielding, or compensating for leadership gaps, the decision has often already been made, just not acknowledged. Why Smart Owners Explore the Market Early High-performing PE firms, and increasingly, sophisticated private owners, often explore the executive market before a final decision is reached. This isn’t about undermining management; it’s about sharpening judgment. Seeing the caliber of available talent reframes the question from “Can this work?” to “Is this the best we can do?” In many cases, an external perspective provides clarity faster than another quarter of internal debate. Timing is Everything Upgrading management is never easy. But the evidence, data, deals, and lived experience are clear: indecision is rarely neutral. The organizations that consistently outperform aren’t the ones that change leaders most often. They’re the ones who change them on time. And in a world of compressed timelines, competitive markets, and rising expectations, timing isn’t just a leadership issue; it’s a value creation issue.