How to Maximize Benefits of Behavioral Assessment Tests

How to Maximize Benefits of Behavioral Assessment Tests in the Hiring Process

This article is the first in 180one’s two-part series looking at behavioral assessment testing as part of the hiring process.

Hiring managers know there’s no perfect process for selecting the best candidate for a job, so it makes sense to utilize all the tools you can access to improve that process. At 180one, we’re finding that organizations are increasingly using behavioral assessment tests, often also referred to as personality tests, to help evaluate the suitability and predicted performance of high-level job candidates.

These tests can be a valuable resource, but they don’t paint a full or completely accurate picture on their own of a candidate’s ability to succeed in a job. When looking at indicators for success, research shows that in the hiring process, the general interview provides a 15% measure of success, and reference checks are about 7%, while cognitive or behavioral assessments are 25-30% effective.

Data suggests that these assessments have an important role to play as a tool leading to a great hire. There’s a wide range of test styles to choose from, at a range of price points, and taking a behavioral test today is a much more automated process than when they were first used in industrial settings.

Leading Behavioral Assessment Tools

The most popular and high-profile tests being used by hiring managers today include the following:

Hogan – Hogan’s tagline is “The Science of Personality,” and they offer a suite of business-based assessments for hiring and development. Their cornerstone assessment, the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI), identifies qualities that describe how an employee will relate to others when they are at their best, and gives insight into how people work, how they lead, and how successful they will be. Hogan assessments are used by many Fortune 500 companies, including Intel, McDonald’s, Merck, GM, Microsoft and Cisco.

DISC – DISC’s accessibility and ease of plugging in results to success models makes it one of the most widely used workplace behavioral assessment tools today, and it’s also the one with the earliest origins. It was first developed in the 1920s by William Moulton Marston (also the inventor of the first lie detector and the creator of Wonder Woman). Marston theorized that the behavioral expression of emotions in relationship to environment could be categorized into four primary types: Dominance (D), Inducement or Influence (I), Submission or Steadiness (S), and Compliance (C). DISC assessments are also used by many Fortune 500 companies, particularly within management, including General Electric, Chevron and Walmart.

Wonderlic – The Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT-R) helps measure general mental ability, which it touts as being widely accepted as one of the single best predictors of job success. The Wonderlic “Wonscore” assesses and ranks potential employees in the areas scientifically proven to predict job performance: Cognitive ability + motivation + personality. The NFL uses Wonderlic to assess their quarterbacks – it’s a timed test and can evaluate a person’s ability to make quick decisions without knowing all the options.

Myers-Briggs – the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) continues to be the most widely used personality test worldwide, although it has a different role than behavioral assessments in predicting success in the workplace. MBTI personality testing includes behavior, traits and character, and is based on psychologist Carl Jung’s model of “Psychological Types.” His belief was that every person has an innate desire to grow, and part of that growth comes from understanding, individually, how we operate in the world.

How Behavioral Assessment Tools Can Miss the Mark

In the early days of behavioral assessments for work, the candidate or employee would take the test, then an industrial psychologist or other trained analyst would scrutinize the test to identify behaviors especially suited or contrary to job benchmarks. (We’ll look at how job benchmarks help interpret test results in part 2 of this series.)

Today, because almost all popular behavioral assessment tests are administered online, and some are free, there’s a likelihood that the person(s) evaluating a candidate’s behavioral test results may not have much training or experience in how to interpret the information and relate it to other factors significant to predicting job performance and success.

The Nielson Group, which specializes in work-based behavioral assessment testing, has found some common mistakes organizations and hiring managers make in using behavioral style assessments when they don’t have training on how to best use the results.

Tests such as DISC, Wonderlic, or Myers-Briggs can be valuable tools, but these tests won’t be a significant indicator if they are the only tool a company uses to assess a person’s talent and fit. The complexity of determining talent and fit includes other important elements that need to be considered for hiring and developing employees.

Mistake #1: Behavioral assessment test results will tell you who will be a superstar performer or a low performer

Probably the most common error made in using a behavior-based assessment model occurs when someone assumes that it explains who will succeed or fail in a job. Most behavioral assessment tests only measure common behavioral tendencies — not skills, not motivators, not the ability to make quick decisions and good judgment.

A single behavioral assessment without companion tools and analysis does not predict job success — a “best” behavioral job profile for a position can be identified but is not appropriate as the only criteria to consider. Organizational research has shown that in general, any type of behavioral style can succeed in any type of profession, including leadership positions. It’s important to remember a behavioral style is only one part of the picture and there are many other elements that affect job performance.

Mistake #2: Behavioral style assessments are complete personality profiles appropriate for selection and development

While behavioral assessment tools such as DISC and Wonderlic explore traits within someone’s personality, the term “personality” encompasses much more than the scope of a behavioral assessment test. A complete talent profile is much more than behavior, and includes facets like values, beliefs, the ability to make good judgments and quick decisions, sense of humor, character, ethics, emotional maturity, thinking preferences, soft skills, and communication style. A behavioral assessment test is not a complete measure of who someone is, but simply one aspect of what makes a person unique: how we prefer to act and communicate in a certain situation.

Mistake #3: The hiring manager uses anecdotal data to determine what type of personality would be successful in a given role.

You can get the “right” result, meaning the result you’re looking for, from a test, but are you getting the right person for the job? For example, the “driver” personality is the most over-sought trait hiring leaders look for across all jobs and functions. However, an office full of Type A personalities can create havoc on any organization. Understanding the true personality required for a given role by considering other factors such as emotional intelligence, business acumen, and underlying core motivators, as well as considering other employees’ test results or industry statistics for the profession is critical.

Key takeaways on behavioral assessment tools

With the variety of assessment tools available, it’s important to identify what specific information you want to glean from a test, then research the types of tests in order to choose one (or more) that most closely aligns with your hiring needs.

For example, one test type may work better for you in identifying strong leadership traits your organization needs now, such as Hogan, and another may serve you better in looking at how someone will integrate into a team and their potential to develop into a leadership role, such as DISC.

Maximizing the efficacy of these tests requires experience in analyzing the results, so you’ll get the most out of a behavioral assessment when you partner with a trained user of the assessment tool. They can interpret test results with specific knowledge of your organization’s needs along with comparative data from other organizations with similar needs.

In part 2 of this series, we’ll look at how behavioral assessment tests and results are used in practice: At what stages hiring managers use them in the recruitment and interview processes, and the benefits and drawbacks of that timing; how to use test results in the interview process; and how to use them for onboarding and creating employee development plans.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

From Good to Smaller – How to hire executives from larger companies

By Greg Togni • May 7, 2026

Hiring executives from large, high-performing organizations is one of the most common and most misunderstood moves smaller companies make. The logic is simple: if someone has seen “good” at scale, they should be able to bring it with them. In practice, that translation is far less reliable than most boards and CEOs expect. External executive hires, especially those coming from larger or more prestigious companies, fail at high rates. Numbers vary by study, but many put it around the 40–50% range within the first 18 months, with many more underperforming relative to expectations. The issue usually isn’t raw capability. It’s a mismatch between what made someone effective in their last environment and what this environment actually requires. The appeal of “importing excellence” Boards and CEOs often look externally when they want a step-change. A well-known resume signals ambition and can feel like a shortcut to stronger execution. The hope is that leaders from big companies bring: Repeatable operating patterns Experience with scale and complexity High standards and disciplined cadence That logic can be right in moments like rapid growth or expansion, but it breaks when we assume success is automatically portable across contexts. The portability problem Executive transitions fail most often because of context. What “good” looks like is shaped by culture, incentives, decision norms, and informal power, things that are hard to see from the outside. Big-company leaders can bring frameworks and processes, but they can’t import the conditions that made those tools work, mature systems, brand leverage, deep benches, and established trust. When the environment changes, the old playbook can fail. Why external hires fail When an external executive hire goes sideways, the causes are usually predictable: Cultural mismatch: misreading decision-making, conflict, and what’s truly rewarded. Weak relationship ramp: focusing on strategy before building alignment and trust. Over-reliance on prior supports: assuming budgets, systems, brand, and staffing that aren’t there. Misaligned expectations: different assumptions about mandate, pace, resources, and autonomy. Organizational resistance: skepticism of outsiders magnifies early mistakes. A flawed premise (on its own) In reality, what counts as “good” is highly situational. It’s shaped by a company’s stage, structure, market position, and culture. An executive who thrived in a large, stable organization may struggle in a fast-moving, ambiguous environment - not because they lack skill, but because the definition of success has changed. This doesn’t mean hiring from large organizations is a bad strategy. It means the strategy is often applied too simplistically. When it works (how to hire successfully) External hires tend to succeed when there’s a genuine match between past experience and current needs, not just in industry or function, but in context. Leaders who have navigated similar stages of growth or similar organizational constraints are far more likely to adapt effectively. Smaller and earlier-stage companies require different “muscles”: operating with constraint, making decisions with incomplete data, and building systems from scratch. Hiring from large organizations can be a great strategy if you also screen for those portability skills. Success also depends heavily on onboarding and integration. Companies that treat executive transitions as a structured process, focused on relationships, context-building, and expectation alignment, see much better outcomes. Perhaps most importantly, both sides need to approach the transition with humility. Executives must be willing to question their assumptions and adapt their playbooks. Organizations must recognize that even highly capable leaders need time and support to understand how things actually work. The takeaway Hiring executives from large organizations isn’t misguided. But the belief that success can simply be transplanted is. Leadership effectiveness is not just about what someone knows; it’s about how well they can interpret and respond to a specific environment. Without that alignment, even the most impressive resumes can lead to disappointing results. The real challenge isn’t finding leaders who have seen excellence. It’s finding those who can recreate it under entirely different conditions.

Globe Machine Selects New Board Member

By Effie Zimmerman • May 5, 2026

180one is pleased to announce our recent partnership with Globe Machine and the resulting hire of their new Board Member For over a century, Globe Machine Manufacturing Company has been at the forefront of delivering custom-engineered factory solutions for manufacturers. Our solutions combine decades of proven mechanical performance with cutting-edge automation, controls, and robotics, empowering our customers to achieve next-level operational efficiency. Globe Machine was acquired by Westward Partners in 2024. Westward Partners is a Seattle-based private equity firm investing in lower-middle-market businesses across a variety of industries in the Pacific Northwest. The acquisition will set Globe up for accelerated growth and help the Company better serve new and existing customers through innovation, training, parts, and service – something it has done successfully for over a century. Congratulations to Globe Machine and the 180one Search Team on a successful executive placement!

New Opportunity: Director of Product Management

By Effie Zimmerman • April 30, 2026

Director of Product Management ABOUT THE COMPANY A-dec is the premium leader in the dental equipment industry, designing and manufacturing products that span dental chairs, lights, handpieces, furniture, air management, infection control, and delivery systems found in dental offices and operatories. With over 1300 employees and headquartered in Newberg, Oregon, A-dec’s familial culture and values have been attributed to their commitment to the Newberg community and its employees through various investments and programs. ABOUT THE POSITION Reporting into the SVP of Product & Technology, the Director, Global Product Management leads teams that manage all A-dec products, including dental furniture, consumables, and core equipment (chairs, units, lights). They direct the strategic vision and purpose and are responsible for the long-term financial performance of A-dec’s product portfolio. Critical functions for this position include roadmap development, voice of the customer process, portfolio execution, roadmap execution, and the product section of the company’s business strategy. DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES Creates the vision and purpose of Product Management. Leads all product management activities for the existing product lines within A-dec Builds and leads a diverse, high-performing product management team. Provides mentorship, support, and guidance, and encourages professional growth and development. Champions the strategic vision and purpose for Product Management across the organization. Implement strategic and tactical plans to meet the company’s objectives while exceeding customer needs. Maintains a constant pulse of dental equipment market developments, including consumer needs, competitive offerings, and brand position. Takes proactive measures to remain competitive with the existing portfolio. Follows industry trends and conducts capability analysis regularly. Executes competitive assessments and market research to gain market and buying preference and insights. Understands and articulates the voice of the customer. Makes tradeoff comparisons to drive decisions that deliver on success criteria. Accountable for concept development selection. Develop strategies in collaboration with Global Sales Team leaders to drive market share growth. Collaborates with Marketing Communications to plan, direct, and execute measurable global actions to drive brand awareness, preference, and demand generation necessary for achieving growth goals. Collaborates with Digital Product Management to ensure complete end-to-end solutions. Reviews revenue and profits on a weekly basis and suggests approaches to marketing and sales to drive growth. Responsible for overall product promotions and analyzing the revenue/net margin trade-offs. Accountable for the standard margins of the portfolio; pricing, positioning, and margins. Works across organizational boundaries to develop a cohesive strategy and ensures smooth execution of cross-functional plans within A-dec. Leads the future portfolio planning with their leadership. QUALIFICATIONS Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities Extensive project management experience. Excellent presentation, communication, and customer skills. Proven leadership skills and effective problem-solving skills. Demonstrated experience in planning, budgeting, and developing business strategies. Ability to influence up, down, and across the organization. Education and Experience Bachelor’s degree in engineering, business management, or a similar focus. Five years of experience in product management. Five years of people leadership experience. Experience and understanding of the “Chief Engineer/Project Chief” methodology or practice. Preferred Experience Master’s degree in business administration. Experience with strategic planning and managing a category P&L in excess of $100 Million. Interested in Learning More? 180one has been retained by A-dec to manage this search. If interested in learning more about the opportunity, please contact Lisa Heffernan / 971.256.3076/ lisa@180one.com .