Interview Bias: How It Happens & How to Avoid It, Part 1

Resume

This article is the first in 180one’s two-part series looking at how your organization can identify and avoid Interview Bias, and why it’s a vital consideration in hiring. Check back in Next Week for the next installment. Read a piece about the importance of good DEI practices here.


Part I

Have you ever interviewed a candidate who you clicked with right away? Have you ever interviewed a candidate who you felt in your gut wasn’t a fit the moment they walked in the door? Research by business consulting groups and institutions such as Harvard Business School consistently shows that many high-level hiring decisions are made based not on a candidate’s qualifications or capabilities, but rather on the hiring manager’s first impressions. These subconscious and subjective reactions to a candidate injected in the interview process are known as “interview bias.”


180one is kicking off the new year with a two-part series to help your organization identify and avoid the pitfalls of interview bias, and to dig into evaluation and interview techniques that greatly diminish bias.


How Bias Can Work Its Way Into the Hiring Process

From the first look at a resumé’s language to the opening moments of a first meeting, interview bias will often derail an objective evaluation of a prospective employee. It’s human nature to bring our own background and biases to a first meeting in the professional environment, just as we do in a social setting. However, unconscious biases can lead to social categorizations that influence how a hiring manager or team land on their top candidate – these categorizations are often not logical, and, at times, not legal.


In working with our clients, we’ve found that hiring managers may read something on a candidate’s resumé before he or she has even met the candidate that influences their perception of the quality of the candidate. This sometimes leads them to begin looking for reasons to hire or not to hire.


Companies invest significant time and money to attract the most qualified candidates for executive-level positions, and that investment in the hiring process should lead to selecting the most suited skill set of the pool. Personnel psychology researchers have found, however, that the social exchange of interviews, while still the most widely used form of candidate assessment, predict less than 15% percent of ultimate employee performance yet open up the most opportunities for bias. (For a deep dive on this, here’s a recent study by renowned researcher Frank Schmidt.)


Types of Interview Bias

What are the most common types of interview bias? Management and organizational researchers have repeatedly observed several biases common across many industries that can have a negative impact on choosing the most qualified candidate for the job.


“Like Me” Bias: It’s human nature to think highly of someone who has a similar mindset or personality to your own, and “Like Me” bias can easily happen when a candidate appears to be similar in style or personality to the hiring manager – as a result, the hiring manager feels that candidate would be best suited for the job. An example is when a candidate attended the same school as the person evaluating their resumé, and/or majored in the same field of study, it’s determined that candidate must be qualified.


Halo/Pitchfork Effect: The Halo Effect happens when one positive characteristic of the candidate influences the entire interview process in favor of the candidate. For example, a candidate has a degree from an Ivy League university, so the assumption is made they must be highly competent.

The opposite of Halo is known as the Pitchfork Effect, when one negative characteristic overshadows the candidate’s overall qualifications. For example, when we are reviewing candidates with our client, we see the Pitchfork Effect come up when a hiring manager states their company hired someone from ‘X’ organization in the past, and people who come from ‘X’ organization don’t fit their company’s culture. 


Stereotyping Bias: This is our inclination to hold an opinion about how a person will think or act because they’re a certain race, gender, religion or another characteristic. One of the most prevalent stereotypes is that a female candidate with small children will require flexibility in their work schedule.


Nonverbal bias: Nonverbal bias occurs when a candidate is assessed in a positive or negative light because of an observed attribute, such as body language or an aspect of physical appearance. Examples of this include style of dress, weight, speech patterns, eye contact, or mannerisms such as the firmness of a handshake.


Negative Emphasis Bias: When the interviewer receives one piece of negative information and uses it as a base for entire hiring decision. People have a natural tendency to give negative information more weight than positive information. 


Cultural Noise: The interviewer’s ability, or lack of, to distinguish between a candidate’s answer that is crafted to be more socially acceptable or on-trend rather than revealing their true belief or experience.


Contrast Effect: When a candidate with a stronger presentation style interviews after a weaker-style candidate, the stronger-style candidate may appear more qualified because of the contrast between the two.


When a hiring manager collaborates with a recruitment firm like 180one to address the many potential pitfalls of interview bias, the search consultant can help unpack and unwind assumptions made about a candidate and arrive at a much more objective ranking.


In Conclusion

Interview bias is a broad topic to explore, so we’re digging into it in two parts. In our second article in the series, we’ll discuss the importance of overcoming common biases, and look at tactics for building a more diverse employee group. A dynamic mix of races, genders, and points of view in the workplace is incredibly valuable for improved productivity and creativity, as research has shown that diverse teams consistently outperform more homogenous teams.  For more insights check back for Part 2 of series on bias.  While you're at the Water Cooler read another article about ways to improve your hiring processes entitled "Diversity and Inclusion in Recruitment - Five Best Practices."

By Effie Zimmerman May 21, 2026
Chief Financial Officer ABOUT THE COMPANY  Milwaukee Electronics (MEC) was founded in 1954, offering services in circuit board design and PCBA assembly to the mining industry in the Wisconsin, USA, region. Michael Stoehr purchased the company in 1985 with the mission of creating a business that would put customers first and be a fulfilling place to work for the employees serving those customers. MEC has since grown into an international organization with locations in Wisconsin, Oregon, Mexico, India, and Singapore, serving a multitude of industries and customers from Fortune 50 companies to small, privately held organizations. Jered Stoehr is the second generation to take the Chief Executive helm, carrying on his father’s customers-first legacy and ensuring that MEC maintains the entrepreneurial spirit that has allowed the company to continually expand its range of services, maintain decades-long customer relationships, and provide careers for many dedicated employees. Our services include: End-to-end electronics manufacturing services, including PCBA, box build, and test Program management, including supply chain and logistics management Quick-turn prototype and on-demand manufacturing Our Mission is Acceleration. For customers, we bring innovations to life from prototype to production. We turn their vision into reality and accelerate what’s possible through partnership, a commitment to quality, and flexible processes. For employees, we create opportunities to grow and change. Through continuous learning programs, internal promotions, and a culture of personal care, we accelerate the cycle of abundance for our people and our communities. Our 70+ years in electronics innovation is powered by our incredible people, from the factory floor to the corporate office, who bring this mission to life each day. POSITION SUMMARY The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) reports directly to the CEO and is a key member of the executive leadership team, responsible for all aspects of financial management, strategy, and performance. The CFO partners closely with operations, supply chain, and commercial leaders to align financial goals with manufacturing objectives while ensuring compliance, efficiency, and sustainable growth. This role requires an experienced finance leader with strong knowledge of manufacturing operations, cost accounting, and global business practices. The CFO will provide strategic financial guidance, manage risk, and ensure the company has the resources and insights to achieve its objectives. Essential Duties and Responsibilities Strategic Leadership Serve as a strategic partner to the CEO, President, executive team, and board of directors, providing insights on growth, profitability, and sustainability. Develop and execute financial strategies that support long-term business objectives. Provide recommendations on operational efficiency, capital allocation, and expansion opportunities. Maintain a strong relationship with financing partners. Development of financial plans and forecasts, capital expenditure plans, budgets, cashflow forecasts and covenant forecasts. Financial Management & Reporting Oversee domestic and international financial operations, including accounting, reporting, tax, and treasury functions. Ensure accuracy, timeliness, and compliance of financial reporting under U.S. GAAP and local statutory requirements in Mexico, India, Singapore, and other jurisdictions. Lead preparation and presentation of financial results, KPIs, and dashboards for executive leadership and stakeholders. Work with the outside CPAs for successful financial audit and tax reporting. Operations & Cost Management Partner with manufacturing leaders to monitor operational performance and key cost drivers. Oversee cost accounting, inventory valuation, and margin analysis to support informed decision-making. Drive initiatives that enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and improve profitability across global operations. Lead the relationships with the benefit providers, 401k, self-insured health and dental, disability and life. Maintain a competitive benefit package that is cost-effective. Contracts, Risk & Compliance Manage and negotiate the business insurance package. Negotiate, review, and manage NDA’s and contracts with customers, vendors, and service providers. Ensure compliance with federal, state, and international financial and tax regulations. Strengthen internal controls and risk management practices across the organization. Team Leadership & Development Lead and mentor the finance team, including a Director of Finance, Corporate Controller, and the corresponding accounting teams. Foster a culture of accountability, collaboration, and continuous improvement. Develop team capabilities to support evolving business needs. Global Responsibilities Oversee domestic and international financial operations, ensuring compliance with U.S. GAAP and local statutory requirements in Mexico, India, Singapore, and other jurisdictions. Manage global tax strategy, including transfer pricing, cross-border compliance, and coordination with external auditors and advisors. Drive consistency in financial practices, systems, and reporting across all locations while respecting local requirements. Collaborate effectively across diverse geographies, time zones, and cultures to ensure alignment and accountability. KEY PARTNERSHIPS The CFO will collaborate across the organization to bridge finance with operations, including: Operations & Manufacturing – Partner with Plant General Managers, Supply Chain, Logistics, and Quality teams to manage production performance, cost drivers, and efficiency improvements. Engineering & Product Development – Collaborate with R&D and Process Engineering on new product investments, process improvements, and automation initiatives. Commercial Functions – Support Sales, Business Development, and Program Management with pricing strategy, contract terms, revenue forecasting, and customer profitability. Corporate Services – Align with HR on labor costs and workforce planning, IT/ERP on systems and reporting integration, and Legal on contracts, risk, and compliance. Executive Leadership & Board – Partner with the CEO and board of directors to provide insights on financial performance, growth opportunities, and long-term strategy. QUALIFICATIONS Bachelor’s degree in Accounting, Finance, or related field required; CPA with 5+ years of professional experience required. MBA or CMA strongly preferred. 15+ years of progressive finance experience, including 5+ years in a senior leadership role. Proven expertise in manufacturing finance, including cost accounting, margin analysis, and operations support. Demonstrated success in contract negotiation, risk management, and global financial operations, including multi-site, international entities. Experience in mid-sized companies ($100M–$250M revenue) and familiarity with scaling finance across multi-site global operations preferred. Strong executive communication skills with the ability to influence across functions, geographies, and cultures. Hands-on, detail-oriented leader with a strategic mindset, adaptability, and integrity in a fast-paced environment. Key Competencies Strategic, financial, and analytical thinker with proven ability to align financial strategy to business goals Deep understanding of manufacturing operations, cost structures, and operational performance drivers. Strong business acumen with demonstrated negotiation and partnership skills. High integrity and commitment to ethical practices Collaborative leadership style with a focus on developing people and building high-performing teams. Advanced data analysis skills and systems expertise, including ERP and CRM platforms, business intelligence tools, and Excel, with the ability to translate data into actionable insights. Interested in Learning More? 180one has been retained by Milwaukee Electronics to manage this search. If interested in learning more about the opportunity, please contact Tom Haley / 503.334.1350/ tom@180one.com .
By Greg Togni May 7, 2026
Hiring executives from large, high-performing organizations is one of the most common and most misunderstood moves smaller companies make. The logic is simple: if someone has seen “good” at scale, they should be able to bring it with them. In practice, that translation is far less reliable than most boards and CEOs expect. External executive hires, especially those coming from larger or more prestigious companies, fail at high rates. Numbers vary by study, but many put it around the 40–50% range within the first 18 months, with many more underperforming relative to expectations. The issue usually isn’t raw capability. It’s a mismatch between what made someone effective in their last environment and what this environment actually requires. The appeal of “importing excellence” Boards and CEOs often look externally when they want a step-change. A well-known resume signals ambition and can feel like a shortcut to stronger execution. The hope is that leaders from big companies bring: Repeatable operating patterns Experience with scale and complexity High standards and disciplined cadence That logic can be right in moments like rapid growth or expansion, but it breaks when we assume success is automatically portable across contexts. The portability problem Executive transitions fail most often because of context. What “good” looks like is shaped by culture, incentives, decision norms, and informal power, things that are hard to see from the outside. Big-company leaders can bring frameworks and processes, but they can’t import the conditions that made those tools work, mature systems, brand leverage, deep benches, and established trust. When the environment changes, the old playbook can fail. Why external hires fail When an external executive hire goes sideways, the causes are usually predictable: Cultural mismatch: misreading decision-making, conflict, and what’s truly rewarded. Weak relationship ramp: focusing on strategy before building alignment and trust. Over-reliance on prior supports: assuming budgets, systems, brand, and staffing that aren’t there. Misaligned expectations: different assumptions about mandate, pace, resources, and autonomy. Organizational resistance: skepticism of outsiders magnifies early mistakes. A flawed premise (on its own) In reality, what counts as “good” is highly situational. It’s shaped by a company’s stage, structure, market position, and culture. An executive who thrived in a large, stable organization may struggle in a fast-moving, ambiguous environment - not because they lack skill, but because the definition of success has changed. This doesn’t mean hiring from large organizations is a bad strategy. It means the strategy is often applied too simplistically. When it works (how to hire successfully) External hires tend to succeed when there’s a genuine match between past experience and current needs, not just in industry or function, but in context. Leaders who have navigated similar stages of growth or similar organizational constraints are far more likely to adapt effectively. Smaller and earlier-stage companies require different “muscles”: operating with constraint, making decisions with incomplete data, and building systems from scratch. Hiring from large organizations can be a great strategy if you also screen for those portability skills. Success also depends heavily on onboarding and integration. Companies that treat executive transitions as a structured process, focused on relationships, context-building, and expectation alignment, see much better outcomes. Perhaps most importantly, both sides need to approach the transition with humility. Executives must be willing to question their assumptions and adapt their playbooks. Organizations must recognize that even highly capable leaders need time and support to understand how things actually work. The takeaway Hiring executives from large organizations isn’t misguided. But the belief that success can simply be transplanted is. Leadership effectiveness is not just about what someone knows; it’s about how well they can interpret and respond to a specific environment. Without that alignment, even the most impressive resumes can lead to disappointing results. The real challenge isn’t finding leaders who have seen excellence. It’s finding those who can recreate it under entirely different conditions.
By Effie Zimmerman May 5, 2026
180one is pleased to announce our recent partnership with Globe Machine and the resulting hire of their new Board Member For over a century, Globe Machine Manufacturing Company has been at the forefront of delivering custom-engineered factory solutions for manufacturers. Our solutions combine decades of proven mechanical performance with cutting-edge automation, controls, and robotics, empowering our customers to achieve next-level operational efficiency. Globe Machine was acquired by Westward Partners in 2024. Westward Partners is a Seattle-based private equity firm investing in lower-middle-market businesses across a variety of industries in the Pacific Northwest. The acquisition will set Globe up for accelerated growth and help the Company better serve new and existing customers through innovation, training, parts, and service – something it has done successfully for over a century. Congratulations to Globe Machine and the 180one Search Team on a successful executive placement!
More Posts